An undercover investigation by BBC Information has discovered proof of individuals falsely claiming to be homosexual to realize asylum within the UK. The findings are regarding. However reasonably than assume this implies all asylum candidates are mendacity, it’s value asking why individuals may be drawn to this route.
There’s good cause for the UK and different international locations to supply refuge to LGBTQ+ asylum seekers. Intensive proof from organisations akin to Human Rights Watch and UNHCR reveals that LGBTQ+ individuals in international locations like Pakistan and Bangladesh face imprisonment, household and group violence, police harassment and so-called honour-based abuse. That is exactly why sexual orientation is recognised as a foundation for cover in worldwide refugee legislation.
Sexual orientation claims make up a really small proportion of general asylum purposes. Solely 2% of all asylum claims made in 2023 included sexual orientation as a part of the reasoning.
Proving to the Dwelling Workplace that somebody is LGBTQ+ isn’t a simple feat. The BBC investigation repeats an adviser’s declare that “there is no such thing as a check-up”. In actuality, the Dwelling Workplace conducts an intensive refugee standing dedication course of. This entails two interviews, and locations the burden of proof on the claimant to indicate that they require safety from persecution.
Lately, sexuality in asylum claims has come to be about id, reasonably than behaviour. This view – which is usually about how individuals see themselves or what protests or nightclubs they attend – isn’t essentially in line with how candidates perceive their very own sexuality.
Analysis means that decision-makers usually depend on slim, formulaic expectations of how an LGBTQ+ individual “ought to” behave, reasonably than correctly assessing the danger of persecution. For instance, one among our analysis members, a Ugandan refugee, stated that her having been beforehand married to a person (in a pressured marriage), was taken as proof that she was not a lesbian.
The asylum course of makes stereotypical performances of credibility simpler to learn for decision-makers, in comparison with the ambivalent and fluid actuality of LGBTQ+ lived expertise. It privileges linear emotional journeys and open and visual participation in LGBTQ+ areas. That is usually via a western lens of what sexual orientation as an id means.
For instance, analysis has proven that perceptions of homosexuality being at odds with faith means non secular LGBTQ+ asylum seekers face extra suspicion.
This creates incentives for authorized specialists, charity employees and advisers to package deal LGBTQ+ claimants into institutionally recognisable classes. In different phrases, it’s the evaluation course of itself that produces the situations through which “coached” identities are seen as a method via the asylum system.
Fabricating a declare isn’t simple, nonetheless: it’s dangerous, costly and sometimes unsuccessful. One of many BBC’s core examples, “Ali”, was finally not profitable in securing refugee standing within the UK. For the reason that passage of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022, a fair larger commonplace of proof has utilized to all asylum claims.
A tradition of disbelief
Analysis in refugee and migration research has constantly proven proof of a widespread tradition of disbelief by authorities in direction of individuals searching for asylum. That is significantly true within the case of these basing their claims on their sexual orientation.
Asylum programs are sceptical by design. Candidates bear lengthy, detailed interviews. They have to display consistency and plausibility, and face important rejection charges. Within the UK, the preliminary grant fee for the yr ending December 2025 was 42%, which means most claims have been rejected (many of those are later granted on enchantment).
On the identical time, a scarcity of accessible details about the asylum system in addition to reasonably priced authorized recommendation and illustration imply that candidates are simply misled or exploited by unhealthy religion actors.
Learn extra:
Authorized help for asylum seekers is difficult to return by – it’s no marvel prison advisers are taking benefit
AVPics/Alamy
The BBC investigation exposes a handful of circumstances, however there is no such thing as a credible proof that fraudulent claims on this class are widespread. When comparable allegations have been made by former dwelling secretary Suella Braverman in 2023, the Dwelling Workplace was unable to supply proof of systemic abuse.
Greater than something, the BBC’s report is proof of a regulatory subject within the authorized system that ought to be addressed. However it’s more likely to solid suspicion over LGBTQ+ asylum claims extra broadly, reinforcing the concept that individuals searching for asylum are attempting to “recreation the system”. It says little in regards to the structural situations that form these claims within the first place. These embody an underfunded authorized help sector, and the dearth of secure and managed routes for refugees, forcing individuals into precarious and casual programs within the first place.
Reasonably than main to higher decision-making by the Dwelling Workplace, panic over pretend claimants may create a harsher environment the place these with well-founded concern of persecution might discover it even more durable to be protected.
