Pic The Australian
By Peter Gargan, Constitutional Analyst
Letter to Angus Taylor, Member for Hume
The election in beneath two weeks have to be postponed, to revive the Rule of Legislation and the Legislation of the Structure and Commonwealth. Each main events are beneath hearth, and the one that gives a method out of the fraud and corruption riddled system uncovered to you, by this correspondence ought to galvanise you to behave promptly to get it postponed. The Frequent Informers ( Parliamentary Disqualification Act 1975. repeals S 46 Structure and breaches S 77 (i,) Structure. The Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948, and Australian Citizenship Act 2007. Each kill the King and with him our Christian heritage changing it with communism.
In my view it’s time for some honesty and integrity to be put in within the Authorities of the Commonwealth. Primarily based upon my analysis, I’m of the opinion that the Commonwealth Electoral Commissioner is a liar and a not but convicted felony. He’s conducting an election to elect “residents” to the Parliament of the Commonwealth in absolute contumelious disrespect to the collective will of the “courts judges and folks” of the Commonwealth expressed within the Commonwealth of Australia Structure Act 1900 and Structure confirmed within the “Voice Referendum”.
The Parliament of the Commonwealth is the final word courtroom, the judges in it are elected, by the folks of the Commonwealth as Topics of the King they like him are sure by the Statute 1 Will and Mary [1688] ( Coronation Oath) C 6.
I’m additionally of the opinion that the Australian Labor Celebration Authorities is a puppet of the New World Order and has been white-anting the Structure since 1948. The Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948, and Australian Citizenship Act 2007 fall foul of S 128 Structure. So too the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 as amended. And likewise the Frequent Informers ( Parliamentary Disqualification) Act 1975. S 77 (i.) Structure prohibits it. All alter the Structure materially.
S 34 Structure is totally clear so is S 128: There are particular issues the Parliament of the Commonwealth is just not allowed to do. The phrases ”’Till the Parliament in any other case supplies’ is a certified energy. It’s not limitless. It has no energy to abolish the King. It has no energy to instill pagan values on the inhabitants at massive, and name it THE LAW.
SECT 34
Till the Parliament in any other case supplies, the {qualifications} of a member of the Home of Representatives shall be as follows:–
(i.) He have to be of the complete age of twenty-one years, and have to be an elector entitled to vote on the election of members of the home of Representatives, or an individual certified to grow to be such elector, and will need to have been for 3 years at least a resident inside the limits of the Commonwealth as current on the time when he’s chosen:
(ii.) He have to be a topic of the Queen, both natural-born or for at the least 5 years naturalized beneath a legislation of the UK, or of a Colony which has grow to be or turns into a State, or of the Commonwealth, or of a State.
SECT 128
Mode of altering the Structure.
This Structure shall not be altered besides within the following method:–
The proposed legislation for the alteration thereof have to be handed by an absolute majority of every Home of the Parliament, and never lower than two nor greater than six months after its passage by means of each Homes the proposed legislation shall be submitted in every State and Territory to the electors certified to vote for the election of members of the Home of Representatives.
But when both Home passes any such proposed legislation by an absolute majority, and the opposite Home rejects or fails to move it or passes it with any modification to which the first-mentioned Home is not going to agree, and if after an interval of three months the first-mentioned Home in the identical or the following session once more passes the proposed legislation by an absolute majority with or with none modification which has been made or agreed to by the opposite Home, and such different Home rejects or fails to move it or passes it with any modification to which the first-mentioned Home is not going to agree, the Governor – Normal could submit the proposed legislation as final proposed by the first-mentioned Home, and both with or with none amendments subsequently agreed to by each Homes, to the electors in every State and Territory certified to vote for the election of the Home of Representatives.
When a proposed legislation is submitted to the electors the vote shall be taken in such method because the Parliament prescribes. However till the qualification of electors of members of the Home of Representatives turns into uniform all through the Commonwealth, solely one-half the electors voting for and towards the proposed legislation shall be counted in any State wherein grownup suffrage prevails.
And if in a majority of the States a majority of the electors voting approve the proposed legislation, and if a majority of all of the electors voting additionally approve the proposed legislation, it shall be offered to the Governor – Normal for the Queen’s assent.
No alteration diminishing the proportionate illustration of any State in both Home of the Parliament, or the minimal variety of representatives of a State within the Home of Representatives, or rising, diminishing, or in any other case altering the bounds of the State, or in any method affecting the provisions of the Structure in relation thereto, shall grow to be legislation except the vast majority of the electors voting in that State approve the proposed legislation.
On this part, “Territory” means any territory referred to in part 100 and twenty-two of this Structure in respect of which there’s in pressure a legislation permitting its illustration within the Home of Representatives.
Frequent Informers ( Parliamentary Disqualification) Act 1975.
S4
Penalty for sitting when disqualified
(1) Any one that, whether or not earlier than or after the graduation of this Act, has sat as a senator or as a member of the Home of Representatives whereas he or she was an individual declared by the Structure to be incapable of so sitting shall be liable to pay to any one that sues for it within the Excessive Court docket a sum equal to the entire of:
(a) $200 in respect of his or her having so sat on or earlier than the day on which the originating course of within the go well with is served on him or her ; and
(b) $200 for on daily basis, subsequent to that day, on which he or she is proved within the go well with to have so sat.
(2) A go well with beneath this part shall not relate to any sitting of an individual as a senator or as a member of the Home of Representatives at a time sooner than 12 months earlier than the day on which the go well with is instituted.
(3) The Excessive Court docket shall refuse to make an order in a go well with beneath this Act that might, within the opinion of the Court docket, trigger the individual towards whom it was made to be penalized greater than as soon as in respect of any interval or day of sitting as a senator or as a member of the Home of Representatives
SECT 4
Fits to not be introduced beneath part 46 of the Structure
On and after the date of graduation of this Act, an individual is just not liable to pay any sum beneath part 46 of the Structure and no go well with shall be instituted, continued, heard or decided in pursuance of that part.
Commonwealth of Australia Structure Act 1900
SECT 75
Authentic jurisdiction of Excessive Court docket.
In all issues–
(i.) Arising beneath any treaty:
(ii.) Affecting consuls or different representatives of different international locations:
(iii.) During which the Commonwealth, or an individual suing or being sued on behalf of the Commonwealth, is a celebration:
(iv.) Between States, or between residents of various States, or between a State and a resident of one other State:
(v.) During which a writ of Mandamus or prohibition or an injunction is sought towards an officer of the Commonwealth:
the Excessive Court docket shall have unique jurisdiction.
SECT 76
The Parliament could make legal guidelines conferring unique jurisdiction on the Excessive courtroom in any matter–
(i.) Arising beneath this Structure, or involving its interpretation:
(ii.) Arising beneath any legal guidelines made by the Parliament:
(iii.) Of Admiralty and maritime jurisdiction:
(iv.) Regarding the identical subject-matter claimed beneath the legal guidelines of various States.
SECT 77
Energy to outline jurisdiction.
With respect to any of the issues talked about within the final two sections the Parliament could make legal guidelines–
(i.) Defining the jurisdiction of any federal courtroom aside from the Excessive Court docket:
That is absolute corruption at its very worst. Because the cartoon in The Australian immediately says: Its curtains.
