Fifteen harmless individuals had been slaughtered at Bondi. Households had been torn aside. Our nation was shaken to its core.
So, what did the federal government do?
They arrange a Royal Fee… that refuses to even identify the ideology behind the assault.
That’s proper.There’s not a single point out of Radical Islam within the phrases of reference for the Royal Fee.
Not. Even. As soon as.
As an alternative, they speak about “social cohesion.”
Let’s be trustworthy about what meaning. It means dodging the reality. It means defending political sensitivities. It means making ready the bottom for extra legal guidelines that silence on a regular basis Australians reasonably than stopping the subsequent assault.
If they will’t even say what brought on this, how can they probably cease it from taking place once more?
Proper now, the Phrases of Reference for this Royal Fee are deeply flawed.
They repeatedly discuss with “social cohesion,” but by no means require the Royal Fee to determine the extremist ideology of Radical Islam that motivated the assault. There’s additionally no clear mandate to look at whether or not immigration or visa insurance policies contributed to the danger. There is no such thing as a requirement to analyze overseas funding or transnational Islamic extremist networks. And most regarding of all, the Royal Fee is explicitly instructed to keep away from “undermining social cohesion,” elevating the actual chance that politically delicate truths shall be watered down or ignored.
Australians deserve honesty. This assault was not brought on by a “lack of cohesion.” It was pushed by radical Islamic ideology. If we refuse to call it, we assure extra assaults. If we refuse to look at how this particular person was capable of be radicalised, enter, or stay in Australia, we depart the identical vulnerabilities vast open.
Submissions to the Royal Fee are open proper now… however solely till Could 2026. Which means the window to affect its course is closing quick.
The federal government has already used this tragedy to push by means of new hate speech legal guidelines that prohibit what Australians can say. As an alternative of fixing the issue, they’re managing the narrative. As an alternative of defending the general public, they’re defending themselves.
If individuals keep silent now, this Royal Fee dangers changing into nothing greater than a taxpayer-funded train in political correctness, one which shifts blame onto society at giant whereas shielding actual failures in coverage, borders, and intelligence.
This issues as a result of what occurs right here will form the longer term.
If the Radical Islamist ideology behind this assault is buried, assets shall be misdirected. Safety businesses shall be hamstrung. Immigration and visa settings will stay untouched. And peculiar Australians will face tighter speech legal guidelines for merely telling the reality.
But when sufficient individuals converse up now, we will sort out the foundation reason for the issue.
We will guarantee Radical Islam will not be solely named however adequately countered. We will push for correct scrutiny of immigration and border controls. We will demand stronger counter-radicalisation measures. And we will shield the basic proper to talk truthfully in regards to the threats dealing with our nation.
Demanding readability will not be hate. Naming the extremist ideology of Radical Islam will not be bigotry. Prioritising nationwide safety will not be racism.
For security. For freedom. For Australia.
Chris Yates and all the workforce at CitizenGO
P.S. They’re making an attempt to utterly whitewash what actually occurred at Bondi Seashore on 14 December 2025. The reality is that radical Islamists gunned down 15 harmless individuals, together with a younger woman. The Royal Fee should identify the scourge of Radical Islam if it hopes to counter it.
Signal our petition now to demand they deal with the foundation reason for the assault!
