By MICHAEL SLOVANOS
CAIRNS Information has acquired a response from a former EPA engineer to our article on claims circulating across the web concerning the so-called “loss of life fog”.
The engineer, Lex Stewart, who we should always add has been lively within the political area as an adviser and is now Australia’s main voice on voting fraud, confirms our suspicions that the “loss of life fog” claims are pure bunk, concern porn and click on bait.
“As an individual educated within the legal guidelines of physics and chemistry, I’ve a whole lot of issues with a few of the claims being made by numerous alarmists, be they leftwingers asserting issues with the Nice Barrier Reef corals as a consequence of farmers utilizing fertilisers tons of of kilometres inland, or by others making all types of claims,” Stewart writes.
“All animals, vegetation, organisms together with human beings reply to stresses or vitamins or medicine and many others in numerous methods, in keeping with a “Dose-Response” relationship, that might be assessed by scientific testing and experiments on rabbits or mice and even people..
“If in case you have a headache, then have a look at the Panadol packet and it states to devour one or two tablets each 4 hours. For those who devour one-hundredth of a Panadol, you ain’t going to dent that headache! A small dose is trivial and of no consequence.”
In 1977 Stewart was the Air Air pollution Management Engineer for half of Sydney after which went on to be put answerable for waste disposal for the entire of NSW, which coated water air pollution, air air pollution, noise and different points.
A part of his work was to evaluate how excessive a chimney needs to be placed on high of a boiler – a part of a manufacturing facility utility or hospital incinerator and many others. Candidates would specify the kind of gasoline (coal or oil or gasoline and many others), and the combustion price and many others.
Stewart says the engineers would work out the forms of pollutant that will be emitted from the chimney and at what concentrations. “In workplaces and public locations we wish to preserve the concentrations of varied pollution (together with mud) all the way down to ranges decided scientifically to characterize no hurt,” he says.
“It was once a few years in the past that I do not forget that the TLV (threshold restrict worth) for sulfur dioxide was once 5 elements per million for an eight-hour working shift publicity. It was subsequently revised to be decrease than 5ppm to permit extra margin for conservatism.
“And subsequently the peak of for instance the chimney on the Mt Isa copper mine’s smelter (885 ft) was set to permit sufficient peak and wind dilution in order that by the point the chimney gases get all the way down to the bottom then the focus of Sulfur Dioxide beneath the worst potential climate circumstances would nonetheless be OK i.e. lower than 5ppm.
“And so I’ve an issue of a declare of a “loss of life fog” affecting anyone, not to mention hundreds of thousands or billions of individuals. I’m acquainted with the toxicity of many chemical substances, and there merely doesn’t exist something like this so known as “loss of life fog”. The problem is a hype, a beat-up.”
Stewart can also be extremely sceptical of the “chemtrail” claims rampant on social media. Cairns Information has beforehand alerted readers to the work of climate expertise researcher Jim Lee, a former “chemtrail” alarmist whose personal analysis led him to average his place.
Stewart says an issue with claims about chemtrails or loss of life fogs is the massive quantity of chemical tonnages required so as to have any poisonous impact on people or agriculture at floor stage.
He says you would want to spray hundreds of thousands of tonnes of the aluminium or barium they’re claimed to include, because of the dilution from above 30,000 ft all the way down to us at floor stage.
Stewart is conscious, nonetheless, that some individuals wish to result in refined atmospheric results on daylight with powders, aiming to trigger some local weather change, “however as soon as once more, you would want to inject huge tonnages into the higher environment so as to have any measurable impact”.
“A far worse supply of air pollution impacting people than any type of air air pollution is coming from being injected into one’s arm or veins by vaccines,” he added.
Jim Lee’s interview with well being journalist Del Bigtree reveals a lot of his historic analysis on the contrail phenomenon which was first observed within the skies over England through the Battle of Britain. Within the late Nineteen Nineties somebody conflated widespread jet contrails with the navy’s use of varied cloud seeding applied sciences.
The frequent, however false declare, was that contrails don’t linger within the environment however “chemtrails do”. Lee has proven that sure atmospheric circumstances that may be tracked, produce lingering contrails. These areas are generally prevented by navy plane to keep away from detection by leaving contrails.
Lee says the true drawback with contrails is that when concentrated in the fitting atmospheric circumstances they create elevated cloud cowl and may block out the solar, which was a topic of an unsuccessful lawsuit within the late Fifties by the Palm Springs municipality towards the US Air Power.
